td-cloud-library
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/html/igamingbrazil.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121Everyone who pays attention to the theme of games of chance in Brazil is sure of one thing, the game will be legal in Brazil. The question is complicated, however, when we are asked when it is time for this to happen. Using a delicious expression widely used by my Brazilian friends, I add that the legislator just needs to use the “pulo do gato” (magic bullet).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The recent changes in the legislative scenario in Bras\u00edlia and the deep crisis caused by a pandemic that has been very harassing for the Brazilian people, may indicate that the moment of the so-called legalization of games of chance, may be closer than ever. And if we believe, as I do, that we are close, it will not be entirely inappropriate to think about what the challenges that the legalization of an activity like this may present for a country like Brazil may be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
i) Legal Basis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the first challenges to be considered by the legislator will be the legal framework to be given to the model of exploitation of the various types of games of chance. In an attempt to simplify the very diverse operational models that exist around the world, we would say that the Brazilian legislator could effectively consider two different models of legal framework. We refer specifically to the concession model used for land-based operations in countries with a similar legal system to Brazil, such as Portugal and Macau; and the license model used in countries such as the United States, United Kingdom and Singapore for land based casinos and in countries like Portugal, Spain and other European countries, for online operations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Since this is not a legal text, I will not discuss the legal theory of each model at length. I therefore leave only a few notes on the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The concessions are normally awarded for situations of exploration of activities that would initially be destined to the states (telecommunications, transport, energy, etc.) and in which the capital invested to develop the infrastructures necessary for the implementation and exploration of that same activity is very significant. This is, for example, one of the reasons why concessions have very long terms – 20 or more years. Afterwards, the exploitation of the concession for a certain activity is often preceded by the payment of a premium for the attribution of the concession, which is then completed either by the payment of an annual reinforcement, or by the payment of another amount defined between the contracting parties, which, in the case of the exploitation of games of chance, may for example be the payment of a tax on the gross revenue from operations and the payment of other types of financial consideration. Another characteristic of the concession is that at the end of the concession term, the objects and properties attached to the concession, revert to the state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the case of licenses, they are intended to authorize a particular individual to explore an activity that would be prohibited, were it not for the issuance of that license. By the way the license is designed, it would apply to activities that, for example, would not require such a significant investment, which is why they are naturally granted for much shorter periods of time (one or five years). In the case of licenses, an amount will be paid for issuing that license and then an amount to be paid, for example as a tax. In this situation, the assets do not revert to the state, maintaining their ownership in the legal sphere of the licensed entity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Having made this distinction of a legal nature, we would say for example that, for land-based casinos, namely those that fit into integrated resorts, the legal framework to follow could be that of the concession as this type of infrastructure will involve significant investments that will certainly take several years until they are effectively amortized. At the end of the concession, both the properties built and the remaining assets allocated to the concession would revert to the state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n